Mindy Yap

Mindy Yap is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and construction torts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mindy Yap has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Torts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duty as to materials and workmanship	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duty to design	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mindy Yap has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mindy Yap has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner'(Nov 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mindy Yap's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mindy Yap's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner' 14 Nov 2019 Orion-One Development Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant)Partial	14 Nov 2019	Orion-One Development Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Respondent, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partOrion-One's appeal was allowed in part regarding liability for design omissions and mitigation issues.