Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri

Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contracts and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contracts and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Termination of Leases	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Options to purchase	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	TG Master v Tung Kee: Option to Purchase, Deposits, and Extension Fees Dispute(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mirza Akmal Bin Mohamad Shahri's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	388,000.00	388,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TG Master v Tung Kee: Option to Purchase, Deposits, and Extension Fees Dispute 01 May 2024 TG Master Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	01 May 2024	TG Master Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedTG Master's appeal was allowed, entitling them to retain the Further Sums and Renovation Costs, and claim unpaid extension fees. The court ordered the Respondents to pay $388,000 in extension fees. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.