Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir

Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and torts. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in litigation and evidence law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Litigation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Epileptic Seizures	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Fernandez LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Maybank Singapore Ltd v Papa Bakerz Pte Ltd: Winding-Up Order and Stay Application(Feb 2025) Dways International v Lim Seow Hui: Damages for Conversion & Defamation(May 2024) Tan Tien Sek v Tan Tien Sai: Oral Contract & Parol Evidence Rule Dispute(Mar 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	4,555.28	4,555.281 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Maybank Singapore Ltd v Papa Bakerz Pte Ltd: Winding-Up Order and Stay Application 09 Feb 2025 Papa Bakerz Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Feb 2025	Papa Bakerz Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication for stay of execution dismissed; winding-up order granted. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Dways International v Lim Seow Hui: Damages for Conversion & Defamation 09 May 2024 Dways International Pte Ltd (formerly known as D’way International Pte Ltd and as Longevite Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	09 May 2024	Dways International Pte Ltd (formerly known as D’way International Pte Ltd and as Longevite Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Damages awarded for misappropriation reducedDamages for misappropriation reduced from $86,154 to US$4,555.28.
3	Tan Tien Sek v Tan Tien Sai: Oral Contract & Parol Evidence Rule Dispute 30 Mar 2023 Tan Tien Sek (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2023	Tan Tien Sek (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for the monetary value of his one-tenth share in the property was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Muhammad Feroz Khan v Public Prosecutor: Bail Application for Accused with Epilepsy 13 Nov 2022 Muhammad Feroz Khan bin Abdul Kader (Applicant)Lost	13 Nov 2022	Muhammad Feroz Khan bin Abdul Kader (Applicant): Application DismissedThe application for bail was dismissed due to the applicant being a flight risk and the Singapore Prisons Service's ability to manage his medical condition.