Mohamed Faizal

Mohamed Faizal is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 36 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 72.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated expertise across 82 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	33 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 33 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	28 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	22 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	11 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Youthful Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse Inference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Registration of Criminals Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reformative Training	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vexatious litigants	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of Information	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Attempted Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adduction of new evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compensation and costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of statute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Purposive approach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Declaratory relief	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Passports Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Importation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed moneylending	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal References	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Consumption	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maid Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Faizal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Faizal has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 30 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	30 cases	83% of cases	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Defamation, and Freedom of Expression(May 2024) Gaiyathiri d/o Murugayan v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing Appeal, Psychiatric Conditions(Jun 2022) Gaiyathiri d/o Murugayan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal to Adduce Fresh Evidence on Sentence for Culpable Homicide(May 2022)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	2 cases	6% of cases	Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor: Application of Registration of Criminals Act to Suspects(Feb 2011) Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Registration of Criminals Act Charges(Oct 2010)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	3% of cases	BPH v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Framework for Sexual Assault by Penetration under Section 376 of the Penal Code(Nov 2019)
District Attorney's Office	1 cases	3% of cases	PP v Ong Chee Heng: Group Violence, Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Sentencing Appeal(Aug 2017)
Attorney-General Chambers	1 cases	3% of cases	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A of Penal Code(Mar 2011)
AG's Chambers	1 cases	3% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Tang Hai Liang: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Faizal's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	62.3 parties avg	2.3	17%
Won	262.1 parties avg	2.1	72%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	82.3 parties avg	2.3
2017	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Faizal's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(8%)	8%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	6(17%)	17%
Won	26(72%)	72%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	8 1115	Lost: 1 cases (12.5%) Neutral: 1 cases (12.5%) Partial: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 5 cases (62.5%)
2017	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 36 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Xu Yuanchen v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Defamation, and Freedom of Expression 19 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	19 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for criminal reference was dismissed.
2	Gaiyathiri d/o Murugayan v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing Appeal, Psychiatric Conditions 28 Jun 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Jun 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed, upholding the original sentence.
3	Gaiyathiri d/o Murugayan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal to Adduce Fresh Evidence on Sentence for Culpable Homicide 03 May 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 May 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedCriminal Motion dismissed in its entirety.
4	BOX v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 17 Years' Imprisonment for Sexual Offences Against Minors 11 Apr 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Apr 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant.
5	Parti Liyani v Public Prosecutor: Compensation for Frivolous Prosecution under Criminal Procedure Code 20 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	20 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe court found that the prosecution was not frivolous or vexatious and dismissed the application for compensation.
6	Goh Chin Soon v Public Prosecutor: False Passport Use & Immigration Act Violations 29 Jul 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	29 Jul 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part, but the conviction was upheld on an amended charge.
7	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Freedom of Expression 15 Mar 2020 The Attorney-General (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	15 Mar 2020	The Attorney-General (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding Wham, with a cease-publication injunction granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Bong Sim Swan Suzanna v Public Prosecutor: Maid Abuse & Relevance of Uncharged Offending Conduct in Sentencing 21 Jan 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	21 Jan 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against sentence dismissedThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
9	BPH v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing Framework for Sexual Assault by Penetration under Section 376 of the Penal Code 12 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against BPH's appeal.
10	BLV v Public Prosecutor: Sexual Assault, Abuse of Process & Sentencing 07 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; sentence enhanced for abuse of process.
11	Public Prosecutor v Gobi a/l Avedian: Illegal Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	24 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal allowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and found the respondent guilty on the original charge.
12	Adili Chibuike Ejike v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate 26 Apr 2018 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	26 Apr 2018	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Applicant's application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed. Both parties bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	PP v Lim Yee Hua: Road Rage Sentencing & Voluntarily Causing Hurt 30 Nov 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	30 Nov 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence for the first charge was dismissed, but the appeal against the sentence for the second charge was allowed. The original sentence imposed for the second charge of a fine of SGD 5,000 is substituted with a three-week imprisonment term. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	PP v Ong Chee Heng: Group Violence, Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Sentencing Appeal 27 Aug 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Aug 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was enhanced.
15	Public Prosecutor v Kesavan Pillai Govindan: Rash Act Endangering Safety 06 Mar 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	06 Mar 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against acquittal was allowed.
16	Muhammad Nasir v Public Prosecutor: Harassment & Moneylenders Act Interpretation 09 Feb 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal.
17	Dewi Sukowati v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide Sentencing Appeal 22 Jan 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Jan 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the original sentence.
18	Ng Jun Xian v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Sexual Assault by Penetration Sentence 28 Dec 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	28 Dec 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the sentence was allowed.
19	Obioha v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution and Setting Aside Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking 16 Nov 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Nov 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for stay of execution and setting aside death sentence was dismissed.
20	Sim Yeow Kee & Loi Wenda v Public Prosecutor: Corrective Training, Mandatory Aftercare Scheme & Sentencing 28 Sep 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	28 Sep 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe Public Prosecutor's position was partially rejected as the court allowed Sim's appeal.
21	Huang Liping v Public Prosecutor: Marriage of Convenience & Criminal Reference 12 Jul 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Jul 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application deniedThe Court of Appeal denied the applicant's application for leave to refer questions of law.
22	Public Prosecutor v Andrew Koh Weiwen: Voluntarily Causing Hurt with Dangerous Weapon 23 May 2016 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	23 May 2016	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was enhanced.
23	Kho Jabing v Attorney-General: Abuse of Process, Res Judicata, and Constitutional Law 19 May 2016 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	19 May 2016	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent successfully defended the appeal.
24	PP v Tan Thian Earn: Sentencing for Possessing Precursor Chemicals under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	10 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed
25	Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan: Sentencing under Misuse of Drugs Act after s 33B Amendment 06 Mar 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	06 Mar 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Life imprisonment imposedThe Public Prosecutor certified that Chum had rendered substantive assistance, and did not argue for the death penalty to be imposed.
26	PP v Wang Zhijian: Murder Conviction Upheld; Diminished Responsibility Defense Fails 27 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the Accused on the 1st and 2nd Charges of the murder offences was allowed.
27	Attorney-General v Mah Kiat Seng: Vexatious Litigant, Criminal Conviction Review, Supreme Court of Judicature Act 11 Sep 2013 Attorney-General (Plaintiff)Won	11 Sep 2013	Attorney-General (Plaintiff): Application GrantedThe Attorney-General's application to declare the defendant a vexatious litigant was granted.
28	Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 04 Aug 2013 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Aug 2013	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
29	PP v Wang Zhijian: Diminished Responsibility, Murder, and Adjustment Disorder 29 Nov 2012 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	29 Nov 2012	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe Public Prosecutor partially won the case, securing a murder conviction on one charge but failing to secure murder convictions on two other charges due to the defense of diminished responsibility.
30	Tang Hai Liang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Application of Statutory Presumptions 01 Aug 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Aug 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence for trafficking in diamorphine was dismissed.
31	Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor: Application of Registration of Criminals Act to Suspects 29 May 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 May 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's motion.
32	Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A of Penal Code 14 Mar 2011 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	14 Mar 2011	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Attorney-General. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor: Application of Registration of Criminals Act to Suspects 28 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to reserve questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
34	Public Prosecutor v Tang Hai Liang: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Jan 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Jan 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced to death.
35	Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Registration of Criminals Act Charges 27 Oct 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Oct 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in partAppeal against conviction under s 13E(5)(a) of the Registration of Criminals Act allowed, and fine of $500 to be refunded. Appeal against conviction under s 13(2)(a) of the Registration of Criminals Act dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Nur Azilah v PP: Youth Offender Sentencing, Moneylender Harassment & Rehabilitation 28 Jul 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	28 Jul 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed and the original sentence of 48 months' imprisonment was overturned.