Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan

Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Collision	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offers to Settle	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Good seamanship	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Regulations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Goush Marikan Law Practice	3 cases	100% of cases	Navigator Aries v Leo Perdana: Apportionment of Liability & Costs After Marine Collision(Sep 2023) Navigator Aries v Leo Perdana: Apportionment of Liability in Surabaya Strait Collision(Jul 2023) Mount Apo v Hanjin Ras Laffan: Collision in Singapore Strait, Traffic Separation Scheme, COLREGS, Apportionment of Liability(Mar 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Goush s/o Marikan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Navigator Aries v Leo Perdana: Apportionment of Liability & Costs After Marine Collision 20 Sep 2023 Owner of the vessel “LEO PERDANA” (Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	20 Sep 2023	Owner of the vessel “LEO PERDANA” (Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in partLiability apportioned at 50:50. Ordered to pay $100,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for the costs of the appeal and the transfer application to the appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Navigator Aries v Leo Perdana: Apportionment of Liability in Surabaya Strait Collision 06 Jul 2023 Owner of the vessel “LEO PERDANA” (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant)Partial	06 Jul 2023	Owner of the vessel “LEO PERDANA” (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; liability apportioned at 50:50.
3	Mount Apo v Hanjin Ras Laffan: Collision in Singapore Strait, Traffic Separation Scheme, COLREGS, Apportionment of Liability 07 Mar 2019 Owner of the ship or vessel “MOUNT APO” (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Mar 2019	Owner of the ship or vessel “MOUNT APO” (Plaintiff): Claim apportionedResponsibility for the collision is apportioned 60:40 in favor of Hanjin Ras Laffan. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).