Mohamed Gul

Mohamed Gul is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Gul has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employees’ Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Right of Set-Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Gul has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Gul has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Partnership	2 cases	40% of cases	Midlink v Stansfield: Tenancy Agreement Dispute over Silence as Acceptance(Aug 2004) Shepherd Andrew v BIL International Ltd: Employment Contract, Severance Payments & Right of Set-Off(Jul 2003)
Peter Low Tang & Belinda Ang	2 cases	40% of cases	Ooi Ching Ling v Just Gems Inc: Breach of Contract & Failure of Consideration(Oct 2002) Ooi Ching Ling Shirley v Just Gems Inc: Security for Costs Appeal(Aug 2002)
Gul & Robert	1 cases	20% of cases	Shih Shin Wang-Liu v Tsai Pei Lun: Trust, Gifts, and Family Disputes over Bank Account(Oct 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Gul's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Lost	23.3 parties avg	3.3	40%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Gul's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	709,928.08	354,964.042 cases	2
USD	550,000.00	550,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shih Shin Wang-Liu v Tsai Pei Lun: Trust, Gifts, and Family Disputes over Bank Account 30 Oct 2006 Tsai Pei Lun Betty also known as Tsai Pei Loon as the Administratrix of the Estate of Shih Tsay-Shing (Defendant)Lost	30 Oct 2006	Tsai Pei Lun Betty also known as Tsai Pei Loon as the Administratrix of the Estate of Shih Tsay-Shing (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against the first defendant for the sum of US$518,247.29 and all other moneys in the UBS account that have been earned from the said sum whether by way of interest or otherwise. If the sum has been commingled with the funds taken from SSM’s account, then the moneys earned on the total amount shall be divided in the proportions of SSM’s contributions to Mrs Shih’s contribution and Mrs Shih should recover the amount due to her as a result of that calculation.
2	Midlink v Stansfield: Tenancy Agreement Dispute over Silence as Acceptance 19 Aug 2004 The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Aug 2004	The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff $679,928.08. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Shepherd Andrew v BIL International Ltd: Employment Contract, Severance Payments & Right of Set-Off 07 Jul 2003 Shepherd Andrew (Plaintiff)Dismissed	07 Jul 2003	Shepherd Andrew (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for severance payments and bonus was dismissed.
4	Ooi Ching Ling v Just Gems Inc: Breach of Contract & Failure of Consideration 10 Oct 2002 Just Gems Inc (Respondent)Won	10 Oct 2002	Just Gems Inc (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJust Gems was awarded US$500,000 for total failure of consideration and US$50,000 for excess payment by mistake. The currency is assumed to be USD, as the original transaction was in USD.
5	Ooi Ching Ling Shirley v Just Gems Inc: Security for Costs Appeal 13 Aug 2002 Just Gems Inc (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2002	Just Gems Inc (Respondent): Application grantedRespondents’ application for further security for costs granted; appellant to furnish $30,000.