Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed

Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in unjust enrichment and family law. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and trusts and estates.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resealing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign domicile grants	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ancillary powers of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Syariah Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Housing and Development Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wardship	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A Mohamed Hashim	6 cases	86% of cases	WKR v WKQ: Contested Resealing of Vanuatu Grant & Domicile Dispute(Oct 2023) WKQ v WKR: Resealing of Foreign Grant of Letters of Administration and Caveats(Mar 2023) Safie bin Jantan v Zaiton binte Adom: Unjust Enrichment & Syariah Court Orders in Family Law(Feb 2023)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	14% of cases	Zaiton v Nafsiah: Unjust Enrichment & Constructive Trusts in Family Dispute(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	57%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	32.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Hashim bin Abdul Rasheed's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	205,359.80	68,453.273 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WKR v WKQ: Contested Resealing of Vanuatu Grant & Domicile Dispute 26 Oct 2023 WKR (Appellant)Won	26 Oct 2023	WKR (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Father's appeal was allowed, and the Judge's orders below were set aside.
2	WKQ v WKR: Resealing of Foreign Grant of Letters of Administration and Caveats 07 Mar 2023 WKR (Caveator)Lost	07 Mar 2023	WKR (Caveator): Application for stay dismissedThe caveator's application for a stay of the applicant's resealing application was dismissed.
3	Safie bin Jantan v Zaiton binte Adom: Unjust Enrichment & Syariah Court Orders in Family Law 07 Feb 2023 Zaiton binte Adom (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	07 Feb 2023	Zaiton binte Adom (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $15,000 in costs to Nafsiah bte Wagiman (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Zaiton v Nafsiah: Unjust Enrichment & Constructive Trusts in Family Dispute 21 Aug 2022 Zaiton binte Adom (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Aug 2022	Zaiton binte Adom (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentJudgment for the Plaintiff against the second defendant; damages awarded in the amount of $205,359.80 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Siraj Ansari v Juliana Bahadin: Trust Deed Validity & Trustee Removal Dispute 07 Aug 2022 Siraj Ansari bin Mohamed Shariff (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Aug 2022	Siraj Ansari bin Mohamed Shariff (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim to set aside the Trust Deed was dismissed.
6	UMF v UMG: Guardianship of Infants Act & Locus Standi of Non-Parents in Custody Dispute 11 Dec 2018 UMF (Appellant)Lost	11 Dec 2018	UMF (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Plaintiff's appeal for custody and care and control of H was dismissed.
7	Salbiah Bte Adnan v Micro Credit: Caveat Removal & Moneylender's Interest in HDB Sale Proceeds 25 Nov 2014 Salbiah Bte Adnan (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2014	Salbiah Bte Adnan (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiff's application to remove the caveat was allowed. The court also ordered that the Defendant be restrained from lodging further caveats against the Property in respect of the 2nd Loan. No monetary amount was specified.