Mohamed Ibrahim

Mohamed Ibrahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and contract law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Motor accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal representatives	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agreements for leases	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Ibrahim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Achievers LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	Syed Almagdad v India International Insurance: Limitation Act & Personal Injury Claims(May 2022) TMO v TMP: Financial Relief for Muslim Marriage Dissolved in Foreign Court(Feb 2017) R1 International v Lonstroff: Anti-Suit Injunction & International Arbitration(Apr 2014)
Kurup and Boo	1 cases	25% of cases	SM Integrated Transware v Schenker Singapore: Lease Agreement Dispute(Mar 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Ibrahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Ibrahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	505,691.85	252,845.932 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Syed Almagdad v India International Insurance: Limitation Act & Personal Injury Claims 23 May 2022 Syed Almagdad bin Syed Faraj (Applicant)Lost	23 May 2022	Syed Almagdad bin Syed Faraj (Applicant): Leave to appeal refusedLeave to appeal the decision of DJ Wong Peck is refused.
2	TMO v TMP: Financial Relief for Muslim Marriage Dissolved in Foreign Court 20 Feb 2017 TMO (Appellant)Won	20 Feb 2017	TMO (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the matter is to be remitted to the Judge to decide the orders to be granted, if any.
3	R1 International v Lonstroff: Anti-Suit Injunction & International Arbitration 13 Apr 2014 R1 International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Apr 2014	R1 International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedR1 International's application for a permanent anti-suit injunction was dismissed.
4	SM Integrated Transware v Schenker Singapore: Lease Agreement Dispute 29 Mar 2005 Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Mar 2005	Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; ordered to pay $505,691.85 in damages, plus costs and interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.