Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub

Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in revenue law and judicial review. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in revenue law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Revenue Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stamp duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Taxation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Relief	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stamp Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Achievers LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	British Steamship v Thresh: Cross-Border Insolvency & COMI Determination(Oct 2024) Re Thresh: Recognition of Bermuda Winding-Up Order under UNCITRAL Model Law(Nov 2023) Asia Development Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of ABSD Remission Decision(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.0 parties avg	3.0	71%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	11.0 parties avg	1.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Ibrahim s/o Mohamed Yakub's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	130,000.00	65,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	British Steamship v Thresh: Cross-Border Insolvency & COMI Determination 23 Oct 2024 British Steamship Management Ltd (Appellant)Lost	23 Oct 2024	British Steamship Management Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal fixed at $40,000 inclusive of disbursements were awarded to the JPLs to be paid by the appellants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Re Thresh: Recognition of Bermuda Winding-Up Order under UNCITRAL Model Law 29 Nov 2023 British Steamship Management Ltd (Non-party)Lost	29 Nov 2023	British Steamship Management Ltd (Non-party): Objections DismissedObjections to the recognition of the Proceeding and the Winding-Up Order dismissed.
3	Asia Development Pte Ltd v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of ABSD Remission Decision 23 Mar 2020 Asia Development Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	23 Mar 2020	Asia Development Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $50,000 awarded to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Asia Development Pte Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Judicial Review of ABSD Remission Decision 01 Aug 2019 Asia Development Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	01 Aug 2019	Asia Development Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application for judicial review was dismissed.
5	Khalid Ali v Alwee Alkaff: Striking Out Action, Breach of Trust, Accessory Liability 27 Feb 2018 Alwee Alkaff (Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2018	Alwee Alkaff (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiffs' claim was dismissed.
6	Asia Development Pte Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Appeal on ABSD Remission Refusal 26 Feb 2018 Asia Development Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	26 Feb 2018	Asia Development Pte Ltd (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and an order was granted in terms of TA 14 of 2017.
7	TMO v TMP: Division of Assets After Foreign Divorce Under Women's Charter Chapter 4A 31 Mar 2016 TMO (Appellant)Lost	31 Mar 2016	TMO (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed as the court found it had no power to grant the remedy sought under s 121G of the Women's Charter.