Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed

Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	12 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	10 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	9 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Elements of crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Helper Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Muslim Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Muzammil & Company	9 cases	69% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Daryati: Murder & Diminished Responsibility Defence(Jun 2021) PP v Lokman & Mubin: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Abetment by Instigation(Mar 2020) Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Importation of Methamphetamine & Wilful Blindness(May 2019)
M/s Muzammil & Co	2 cases	15% of cases	Adili Chibuike Ejike v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate(Apr 2018) Public Prosecutor v Chairul: Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2015)
Muzammil & Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Daniel Vijay v PP: Joint Murder Charge & Common Intention in Robbery(Sep 2010)
Muzammil Nizam and Partners	1 cases	8% of cases	Mohamed Ismail v Mohammad Taha: Validity of Will under Muslim Law(Oct 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	102.4 parties avg	2.4	77%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Muzammil Bin Mohamed's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(77%)	77%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Daryati: Murder & Diminished Responsibility Defence 09 Jun 2021 Daryati (Defense)Lost	09 Jun 2021	Daryati (Defense): Defense of diminished responsibility not provenThe court found that the accused had not proved the defence of diminished responsibility on the balance of probabilities.
2	PP v Lokman & Mubin: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Abetment by Instigation 09 Mar 2020 Lokman bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2020	Lokman bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant): Convicted of drug trafficking and possessionConvicted of trafficking diamorphine to Edy and possession of diamorphine with the intention of returning it to Mubin.
3	Adili Chibuike Ejike v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Importation of Methamphetamine & Wilful Blindness 26 May 2019 Adili Chibuike Ejike (Appellant)Won	26 May 2019	Adili Chibuike Ejike (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal against conviction and sentence allowed; Appellant acquitted of the charge.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Azwan bin Bohari: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Feb 2019 Mohammad Azwan bin Bohari (Defendant)Lost	10 Feb 2019	Mohammad Azwan bin Bohari (Defendant): Conviction and sentence of deathThe Defendant was convicted and sentenced to death.
5	Adili Chibuike Ejike v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Substantive Assistance Certificate 26 Apr 2018 Adili Chibuike Ejike (Applicant)Lost	26 Apr 2018	Adili Chibuike Ejike (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review proceedings against the Public Prosecutor was dismissed. Both parties bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Public Prosecutor v Abd Helmi: Trafficking Diamorphine & Knowledge of Drug Nature 31 May 2017 Abd Helmi bin Ab Halim (Defendant)Lost	31 May 2017	Abd Helmi bin Ab Halim (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted accordingly.
7	Public Prosecutor v. Adili Chibuike Ejike: Illegally Importing Methamphetamine 10 May 2017 Adili Chibuike Ejike (Defendant)Lost	10 May 2017	Adili Chibuike Ejike (Defendant): Death Penalty ImposedThe court imposed the death penalty on the accused.
8	Public Prosecutor v Dewi Sukowati: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 15 Sep 2016 Dewi Sukowati (Defendant)Lost	15 Sep 2016	Dewi Sukowati (Defendant): Imprisonment term of 18 yearsThe accused was sentenced to an imprisonment term of 18 years, with effect from 19 March 2014, the date of her arrest.
9	Public Prosecutor v Chairul: Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Oct 2015 Chairul (Defendant)Lost	26 Oct 2015	Chairul (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted under s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
10	Mas Swan v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Drug Importation & Inconsistent Defenses 13 May 2012 Roshamima binti Roslan (Respondent, Appellant)Neutral	13 May 2012	Roshamima binti Roslan (Respondent, Appellant): Conviction Set AsideConviction for importing diamorphine set aside.
11	PP v Mas Swan: Drug Importation, Wilful Blindness & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Apr 2011 Roshamima binti Roslan (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2011	Roshamima binti Roslan (Defendant): GuiltyConvicted under Section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act; mandatory death sentence pronounced.
12	Daniel Vijay v PP: Joint Murder Charge & Common Intention in Robbery 02 Sep 2010 Nakamuthu Balakrishnan (alias Bala) (Appellant)Lost	02 Sep 2010	Nakamuthu Balakrishnan (alias Bala) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedMurder conviction upheld.
13	Mohamed Ismail v Mohammad Taha: Validity of Will under Muslim Law 11 Oct 2004 Hasnah binti Ibrahim (Plaintiff)Partial	11 Oct 2004	Hasnah binti Ibrahim (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid out of the estateCosts of the plaintiff to be paid out of the estate (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).