Mohamed Najib

Mohamed Najib is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Najib has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fund Management	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Najib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Najib has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Acton Law LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Bajaj v Ueda: Dispute Over Settlement Agreement & Bankruptcy Proceedings(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Najib's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Najib's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	5,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bajaj v Ueda: Dispute Over Settlement Agreement & Bankruptcy Proceedings 21 Oct 2018 Toru Ueda (Defendant, Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2018	Toru Ueda (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the defendant and fixed at $5,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.