Mohamed Nawaz

Mohamed Nawaz is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking and finance and banking law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Nawaz has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations(May 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Nawaz's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Nawaz's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations 16 May 2013 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent)Lost	16 May 2013	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent): Claims dismissedThe Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.