Mohamed Nawaz Kamil

Mohamed Nawaz Kamil is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated expertise across 73 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	13 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Investments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wedding Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Assurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Banking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking off defunct companies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restoration of Company Name	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accumulators	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of moratoria	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership and Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Products	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debentures	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Nawaz Kamil has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Providence Law Asia LLC	7 cases	39% of cases	Babel Holding Ltd: Extension of Moratoria under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act for Cryptocurrency Restructuring(Apr 2023) Yap Sze Kam v Yang Kee Logistics: Judicial Management vs. Bondholder Rights(Feb 2023) Baker v SPH Interactive: Minority Oppression & Conspiracy in Tech Co. Dispute(Sep 2022)
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	28% of cases	Jurong Data Centre v M+W Singapore: Validity of Security Documents & Charges(Mar 2011) Vorobiev Nikolay v Lush John Frederick Peters: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation(Sep 2010) Crédit Industriel v Teo Wai Cheong: Accumulator Agreements & Private Banking(May 2010)
August Law Corporation	2 cases	11% of cases	Lye Yew Cheong v Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority: Restoration of Struck-Off Company Name(Oct 2024) Hall v Rapyd: Without Prejudice Privilege & Oral Admission of Liability in Commission Dispute(Feb 2024)
Providence LawAsia LLC	1 cases	6% of cases	Liu Tsu Kun v Tan Eu Jin: Conspiracy & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Autostyle & VDPL Investments(Sep 2017)
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Wang Choong Li v Wong Wan Chin: Copyright Ownership of Wedding Photographs Dispute(May 2015)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Lee Pei-Ru Alice v Airtrust: Oral Assurances & Investment Repayment Dispute(Nov 2013)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong: Dispute over Equity Accumulator Transactions(May 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Nawaz Kamil's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.6
Complex Cases: 9 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Lost	45.0 parties avg	5.0	22%
Partial	64.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	87.1 parties avg	7.1	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	43.7 parties avg	3.7
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	24.8 parties avg	4.8
2022	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	214.0 parties avg	14.0
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Nawaz Kamil's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	4(21%)	21%
Partial	6(32%)	32%
Won	8(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,093,663.83	899,295.989 cases	9
USD	218,132.18	218,132.181 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lye Yew Cheong v Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority: Restoration of Struck-Off Company Name 22 Oct 2024 Lye Yew Cheong (Applicant)Won	22 Oct 2024	Lye Yew Cheong (Applicant): Application AllowedThe applicant's application to restore the name of Concept Werk Pte Ltd to the Register was allowed.
2	Hall v Rapyd: Without Prejudice Privilege & Oral Admission of Liability in Commission Dispute 22 Feb 2024 Hall, Jonathan Stuart (Claimant, Respondent)Partial	22 Feb 2024	Hall, Jonathan Stuart (Claimant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partParagraphs 22 and 36 of the SOC be struck out, with the exception of the communications stated at paragraph 22(a) of the SOC and as particularised in the Particulars.
3	Babel Holding Ltd: Extension of Moratoria under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act for Cryptocurrency Restructuring 16 Apr 2023 DRB Panama Inc (Other)Lost	16 Apr 2023	DRB Panama Inc (Other): Applications allowedApplications by Babel Holding Limited, Babel Asia Asset Management Private Limited, Babel Block Limited, Moonalpha Financial Service Limited, and Shinar Trading Services Private Limited allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Yap Sze Kam v Yang Kee Logistics: Judicial Management vs. Bondholder Rights 23 Feb 2023 Cosimo Borrelli (Other)Won	23 Feb 2023	Cosimo Borrelli (Other): Application DismissedOpposed the JM Applications.
5	Baker v SPH Interactive: Minority Oppression & Conspiracy in Tech Co. Dispute 25 Sep 2022 Lee Chuen Yang Jeremy (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Sep 2022	Lee Chuen Yang Jeremy (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for minority oppression and unlawful means conspiracy was dismissed.
6	Rooftop Group International: Recognition of US Chapter 11 Proceedings under UNCITRAL Model Law 02 Dec 2019 Polar Ventures Overseas Limited (Non-party, Respondent)Partial	02 Dec 2019	Polar Ventures Overseas Limited (Non-party, Respondent): Application to prevent share transfer not grantedMoratorium does not apply to TGL's application in OS 544/2019 against GIL to enforce its share charge over the first applicant's shares. The stay of proceedings similarly does not apply to proceedings brought by TGL in S 252/2019 to enforce guarantees given to it by AE and GIL for the first applicant's debts.
7	Anuva Technologies v Advanced Sierra Electrotech: Breach of Contract & Unjust Enrichment 13 Oct 2019 ADTEC Electronic Instruments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	13 Oct 2019	ADTEC Electronic Instruments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed
8	Sea-Shore Transportation v Technik-Soil: Conversion & Damages for Equipment Disposal 23 Oct 2018 Sea-Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 Oct 2018	Sea-Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff in the sum of $226,110 on its claim for unpaid rent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Tan Gim Seng v Sea-Shore Transportation: Implied Terms & Limitation in Contractual Rental Dispute 03 Jul 2018 Sea-Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Partial	03 Jul 2018	Sea-Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment for the defendant on its counterclaim in the sum of $69,784 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Liu Tsu Kun v Tan Eu Jin: Conspiracy & Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Autostyle & VDPL Investments 28 Sep 2017 Liu Chung Chi (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Sep 2017	Liu Chung Chi (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim allowed in part against Tan Eu Jin and JE Capital Pte Ltd.
11	Wang Choong Li v Wong Wan Chin: Copyright Ownership of Wedding Photographs Dispute 11 May 2015 Wong Wan Chin (Respondent)Partial	11 May 2015	Wong Wan Chin (Respondent): Judgment for Respondent in partJudgment for Respondent in part. The respondent was successful in defending the copyright of the pre-wedding photographs. The respondent was unsuccessful in relation to the wedding day photographs. The damages awarded needs to be reduced by an amount of $1000. This was the amount awarded by the trial judge for the use of the wedding day photographs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Lee Pei-Ru Alice v Airtrust: Oral Assurances & Investment Repayment Dispute 24 Nov 2013 Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	24 Nov 2013	Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court ordered the defendant to repay the plaintiffs the amounts of S$431,750 and S$863,000, with interest thereon from the date of the writ (Singapore Dollars).
13	Crédit Industriel et Commercial v Teo Wai Cheong: Dispute over Equity Accumulator Transactions 02 May 2012 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff)Won	02 May 2012	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff. Teo is to pay CIC $2,782,803.66 for the shares delivered, $3,625,393.11 for closing out costs, and interest of $51,323.06 as of 29 August 2008 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Jurong Data Centre v M+W Singapore: Validity of Security Documents & Charges 15 Mar 2011 Receivers (Defendant)Won	15 Mar 2011	Receivers (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Vorobiev Nikolay v Lush John Frederick Peters: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation 29 Sep 2010 Vorobiev Nikolay (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Sep 2010	Vorobiev Nikolay (Plaintiff): Application to strike out defendants' application dismissedThe plaintiff's application to strike out the defendants' application to restrain Drew & Napier from acting for the plaintiff was dismissed.
16	Crédit Industriel v Teo Wai Cheong: Accumulator Agreements & Private Banking 19 May 2010 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff)Won	19 May 2010	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the specific monetary amount was not specified in the judgment extract. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Liquidators of Natural Fuel v Power Knight: Priority of Creditors' Interests over Fixed Charge 09 Mar 2010 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Respondent)Won	09 Mar 2010	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against Farooq Ahmad Mann was dismissed.
18	Power Knight v Natural Fuel: Caveat Removal & Statutory Trust in Liquidation 09 Mar 2010 Power Knight Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Mar 2010	Power Knight Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application grantedPower Knight's application to remove the Liquidators' Caveat and the Company's Caveat was granted.