Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil

Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contracts and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Real Estate	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mergers and Acquisitions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mergers and Aquisitions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hin Tat Augustine & Partners	4 cases	100% of cases	East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd v Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute(Apr 2024) RMD Kwikform Singapore v Ehub Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract & Damages(May 2022) Agam v BNP Paribas: Interpretation of Banking Act Sections 14A-14C & 55B-55C, Overseas Banks, Statutory Regulations(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohamed Zikri Bin Mohamed Muzammil's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	16,000.00	5,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd v Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute 16 Apr 2024 Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	16 Apr 2024	Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended against the claimant's claims of trade mark infringement and passing off.
2	RMD Kwikform Singapore v Ehub Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract & Damages 26 May 2022 Ehub Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	26 May 2022	Ehub Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaims DismissedAll counterclaims dismissed.
3	Agam v BNP Paribas: Interpretation of Banking Act Sections 14A-14C & 55B-55C, Overseas Banks, Statutory Regulations 17 May 2017 Ruth Agam (Appellant)Lost	17 May 2017	Ruth Agam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellants to pay the Respondent’s costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal itself (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	BNP Paribas v Jacob Agam: Application for Substitution of Plaintiff Post-Merger 16 Feb 2017 Ruth Agam (Defendant)Lost	16 Feb 2017	Ruth Agam (Defendant): Application for Substitution GrantedDefendants to bear 80% of the costs of the application, fixed at $8,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).