Mohammad Haireez

Mohammad Haireez is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and conspiracy by unlawful means. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohammad Haireez has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohammad Haireez has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Max Sources v Agrocon: Summary Judgment Application for Settlement Agreement Dispute(Apr 2015) EFT Holdings v Marinteknik: Conspiracy by Unlawful Means, Mental Element, Pleading & Proof of Foreign Law(Nov 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohammad Haireez's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohammad Haireez's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Max Sources v Agrocon: Summary Judgment Application for Settlement Agreement Dispute 20 Apr 2015 Max Sources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Apr 2015	Max Sources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Conditional Leave to Defend Granted to DefendantsLeave granted to the Defendants to defend the Plaintiff’s action on the condition that the Defendants shall each within 21 days hereof either (a) pay a sum of $50,000 into court, (b) furnish to the Plaintiff a banker’s guarantee for a sum of $50,000 and on terms which are satisfactory to the Plaintiff, or (c) obtain and provide a solicitor’s undertaking to the court to secure the payment of a sum of $50,000 to the Plaintiff in the event that the Plaintiff’s action is allowed, in default of which the Plaintiff shall be entitled to enter judgment against the defaulting party forthwith without any further order from this court. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	EFT Holdings v Marinteknik: Conspiracy by Unlawful Means, Mental Element, Pleading & Proof of Foreign Law 28 Nov 2013 Priscilla Lim (Respondent)Won	28 Nov 2013	Priscilla Lim (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent.