Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail

Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2000. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commodities and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commodities	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed Moneylender	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
False Evidence	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Mixed statement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Cheating by Personation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Abetment by instigation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutor	1 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ng Ai Tiong: Abetment by Instigation to Give False Evidence in Civil Suit(Jan 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohammad Nizam bin Ismail's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Ng Ai Tiong: Abetment by Instigation to Give False Evidence in Civil Suit 02 Jan 2000 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	02 Jan 2000	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent was found guilty.