Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid

Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and resulting trusts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Tenants-in-common	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Debt Repayment Scheme	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Common intention constructive trusts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Adel Law LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Kow Kim Song v Kow Kim Siang: Application for Sale of Property Under Supreme Court of Judicature Act(Sep 2024) Madina Beevi v M Akbar: Bankruptcy Order Appeal Based on IRDA s 316(3)(e)(Aug 2024)
Abdul Rahman Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Pereira v. Faridah: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Property Dispute(Jul 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohammed Shakirin bin Abdul Rashid's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kow Kim Song v Kow Kim Siang: Application for Sale of Property Under Supreme Court of Judicature Act 08 Sep 2024 Kow Meow Chuan (Gao Miaozhuang) (Applicant)Lost	08 Sep 2024	Kow Meow Chuan (Gao Miaozhuang) (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for the sale of property was dismissed with costs to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Madina Beevi v M Akbar: Bankruptcy Order Appeal Based on IRDA s 316(3)(e) 01 Aug 2024 M Akbar bin Mohamed Ibrahim (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	01 Aug 2024	M Akbar bin Mohamed Ibrahim (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Pereira v. Faridah: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Property Dispute 12 Jul 2017 Faridah bte V Abdul Latiff (Defendant)Partial	12 Jul 2017	Faridah bte V Abdul Latiff (Defendant): Partial JudgmentThe Defendant and Plaintiff are joint tenants in equity in respect of the Changi Court property and the Toh Crescent property. The Plaintiff was declared the sole beneficial owner of the Aston Residence and the Queen’s Road HDB. The Plaintiff’s claim for losses or damages allegedly caused on occasion of the Defendant’s refusal to sign the re-financing documents was declined.