Mohd Goush Marikan

Mohd Goush Marikan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and extension of time. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in damages and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Damages	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unless Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Design Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Products Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mohd Goush Marikan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohd Goush Marikan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny Anne Choo	2 cases	67% of cases	Bonito: Extension of Time for Filing Reference to Registrar for Damages Assessment(Apr 2001) The 'Bonito' v The 'Ah Lam II': Collision Claim & Extension of Time for Damages Assessment(Apr 2001)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	1 cases	33% of cases	Gema Metal Ceilings v Iwatani Techno Construction: Breach of Contract & Defective Ceiling System(Mar 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohd Goush Marikan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohd Goush Marikan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bonito: Extension of Time for Filing Reference to Registrar for Damages Assessment 25 Apr 2001 Ah Lam II (Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2001	Ah Lam II (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
2	The 'Bonito' v The 'Ah Lam II': Collision Claim & Extension of Time for Damages Assessment 25 Apr 2001 'Pu 1804' (Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2001	'Pu 1804' (Respondent): Extension of Time GrantedThe respondents were granted an extension of time to file the reference to the registrar for assessment of damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Gema Metal Ceilings v Iwatani Techno Construction: Breach of Contract & Defective Ceiling System 13 Mar 2000 Iwatani Techno Construction (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Won	13 Mar 2000	Iwatani Techno Construction (M) Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for breach of contract and/or Sale of Goods Act s 14(3) allowed; damages to be assessed.