Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican

Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial review and civil practice.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in judicial review and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Judicial Review	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Expert Determination	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sadique Marican and Z M Amin	2 cases	50% of cases	Evergreat Construction v Presscrete Engineering: Expert Determination & Prevention Principle in Construction Dispute(Dec 2005) Lim Chi Szu Margaret v Risis Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal in Interlocutory Judgment(Oct 2005)
Intelleigen Legal LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Mohd Sadique v Law Society: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions(May 2010)
Frontier Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Property Seizure under Criminal Procedure Code(Apr 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.4 parties avg	2.4	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mohd Sadique Bin Ibrahim Marican's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohd Sadique v Law Society: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions 12 May 2010 Mohd Sadique bin Ibrahim Marican (Applicant)Lost	12 May 2010	Mohd Sadique bin Ibrahim Marican (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to seek a quashing order was dismissed; costs to be paid by the applicants to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Property Seizure under Criminal Procedure Code 12 Apr 2009 Ung Yoke Hooi (Appellant)Lost	12 Apr 2009	Ung Yoke Hooi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed on the ground that the court is not in a position to direct CPIB to release the accounts.
3	Evergreat Construction v Presscrete Engineering: Expert Determination & Prevention Principle in Construction Dispute 07 Dec 2005 Evergreat Construction Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Dec 2005	Evergreat Construction Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to set aside award dismissedThe plaintiff's application to set aside the independent assessor's award was dismissed by the court.
4	Lim Chi Szu Margaret v Risis Pte Ltd: Extension of Time for Appeal in Interlocutory Judgment 30 Oct 2005 Soh Leng Hui (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Oct 2005	Soh Leng Hui (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal dismissed.