Moiz H Sithawalla

Moiz H Sithawalla is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in defamation and misappropriation of funds. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and defamation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Defamation	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Destruction of Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Moiz H Sithawalla has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Moiz H Sithawalla has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	4 cases	100% of cases	Kunal Gobind Lalchandani v LU: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Specific Performance(Mar 2006) Fraser & Neave v Aberdeen Asset Management: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover(May 2001) Fraser and Neave v Aberdeen: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover(May 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Moiz H Sithawalla's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	36.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Moiz H Sithawalla's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	1,090,015.00	1,090,015.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kunal Gobind Lalchandani v LU: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Specific Performance 21 Mar 2006 Govitex Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Mar 2006	Govitex Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for US$1,090,015 in respect of the A Ltd claim (assumed USD, as the judgment involves international transactions and the amount is explicitly stated in USD).
2	Fraser & Neave v Aberdeen Asset Management: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover 23 May 2001 Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant)Neutral	23 May 2001	Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant): Order accordinglyCourt determined the natural and ordinary meaning of the words in the letter.
3	Fraser and Neave v Aberdeen: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover 23 May 2001 Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	23 May 2001	Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe court varied the Assistant Registrar's ruling on the meaning of the words in question.
4	Fraser and Neave v Aberdeen Asset Management: Defamation Claim over Minority Shareholder Treatment 23 May 2001 Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	23 May 2001	Hugh Young (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal against Assistant Registrar’s construction of the words variedThe High Court varied the Assistant Registrar’s construction of the words in question.