MP Rai

MP Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in casinos and gambling and civil practice. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

MP Rai has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Ancillary Matters	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rights of Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	MP Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

MP Rai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cooma & Rai	4 cases	100% of cases	Neo Mei Lan Helena v Long Melvin Anthony: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance Dispute(Jul 2002) Loh Ah Kow v Public Prosecutor: Common Gaming House Definition & Occupier's Liability(Sep 2000) Xpress Print v Monocrafts: Right of Support for Buildings & Negligence in Excavation(Jul 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of MP Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of MP Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Neo Mei Lan Helena v Long Melvin Anthony: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance Dispute 28 Jul 2002 Long Melvin Anthony (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	28 Jul 2002	Long Melvin Anthony (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal partially allowedThe husband's appeal was partially allowed, with the wife's proportion of the three properties reduced from 60% to 50%, and the amount of CPF monies she was entitled to reduced from $187,000 to $182,000. The currency of maintenance was changed to Australian dollars. The lump sum maintenance order was upheld.
2	Loh Ah Kow v Public Prosecutor: Common Gaming House Definition & Occupier's Liability 18 Sep 2000 Loh Ah Kow (Appellant)Lost	18 Sep 2000	Loh Ah Kow (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	Xpress Print v Monocrafts: Right of Support for Buildings & Negligence in Excavation 23 Jul 2000 Monocrafts Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	23 Jul 2000	Monocrafts Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	MFH Marine v Asmoniah: Limitation Act & Workmen's Compensation Claim 14 Jul 2000 MFH Marine Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	14 Jul 2000	MFH Marine Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with costs both here and below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.