Ms X

Ms X is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ms X has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in injunctions and breach of confidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Injunctions	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Inherent jurisdiction to supervise conduct of solicitors	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Former prospective client	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ms X has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ms X has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	100% of cases	Mirpuri v Samtani: Injunction Against Law Firm for Conflict of Interest(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ms X's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ms X's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mirpuri v Samtani: Injunction Against Law Firm for Conflict of Interest 04 Jul 2018 Shanti Shewakram Samtani Mrs Shanti Haresh Chugani (Defendant)Won	04 Jul 2018	Shanti Shewakram Samtani Mrs Shanti Haresh Chugani (Defendant): Application DismissedThe application to restrain the defendant's law firm from acting was dismissed.