Muhamad Imaduddien

Muhamad Imaduddien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	10 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	7 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse and Neglect	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Frontal Lobe Syndrome	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Muhamad Imaduddien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Muhamad Imaduddien has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	8 cases	80% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CRX: Sentencing of Young Offender for Sexual Assault(Jun 2024) Public Prosecutor v Tan Yew Sin: Sexual Assault, Rape, Outrage of Modesty, Mistake of Fact(May 2023) Public Prosecutor v BVJ: Father Sentenced for Sexual Assault and Ill-Treatment of Daughters(Mar 2022)
Attorney-General’s Chamber	1 cases	10% of cases	D Rashpal Singh Sidhu v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction Under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2019)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	10% of cases	PP v Mohammad Zam: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing for Frontal Lobe Syndrome(Sep 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Muhamad Imaduddien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Won	62.3 parties avg	2.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Muhamad Imaduddien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Won	6(60%)	60%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v CRX: Sentencing of Young Offender for Sexual Assault 25 Jun 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	25 Jun 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Reformative training imposedThe court imposed a sentence of reformative training at Level 2 intensity for a minimum period of detention of 12 months.
2	Public Prosecutor v Tan Yew Sin: Sexual Assault, Rape, Outrage of Modesty, Mistake of Fact 11 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	11 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Charges DismissedAll charges against the defendant were dismissed due to reasonable doubt.
3	Public Prosecutor v BVJ: Father Sentenced for Sexual Assault and Ill-Treatment of Daughters 17 Mar 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Mar 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 33 years and two months’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
4	Rahmat Bin Karimon v Public Prosecutor: Review of Conviction under Misuse of Drugs Act after Gobi Decision 04 Aug 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	04 Aug 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave to review the earlier judgment was dismissed.
5	D Rashpal Singh Sidhu v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction Under Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Feb 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	06 Feb 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed and the conviction was overturned.
6	Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of Zainal and Rahmat.
7	PP v Rahmat & Zainal: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act at IKEA 01 Jan 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	01 Jan 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionBoth defendants convicted and sentenced to death.
8	PP v Saravanan Chandaram: Importation of Cannabis & Cannabis Mixture under Misuse of Drugs Act 22 Oct 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	22 Oct 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted on both charges.
9	PP v Gobi a/l Avedian: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Knowledge in Diamorphine Importation 27 Jun 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	27 Jun 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial LossThe accused was convicted on a reduced charge.
10	PP v Mohammad Zam: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing for Frontal Lobe Syndrome 20 Sep 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Sep 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.