Muralli Rajaram

Muralli Rajaram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in restructuring and dissolution and proprietary estoppel. Their track record shows a 35.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated expertise across 76 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ratification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undisclosed Principal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rights and Liabilities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Disability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Open justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deficient Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Delay in Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contamination and Pollution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schizophrenia	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Option Schemes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Animal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muralli Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Muralli Rajaram has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	7 cases	44% of cases	Neptune Capital v Sunmax: Damages for Injunction & Undertaking Breach(Jul 2016) Nithia v Buthmanaban: Proprietary Estoppel & Purchase Money Resulting Trust Dispute(Oct 2015) Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Contractual Indemnity and Third-Party Costs(Jul 2015)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	25% of cases	Animal Concerns Research & Education Society v ANA Contractor: Construction Delay, Defective Backfill, and Negligence Claim(Mar 2010) Ng Hock Kon v Sembawang Capital: Mortgage Enforcement, Notice of Default & Relief from Forfeiture(Oct 2009) George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George: Testamentary Capacity of Schizophrenic Testator(Apr 2009)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	4 cases	25% of cases	Alternative Advisors Investments v Asidokona Mining: Ratification of Loan Agreement(Feb 2024) Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd v Debtor: Assignment, Set-Off & Insolvency(Nov 2023) Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims(Mar 2022)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	2253 Apparel Inc v Medico Titan Pte Ltd: Contract Formation, Misrepresentation, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy(Apr 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Muralli Rajaram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 4 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	64.0 parties avg	4.0	38%
Partial	54.6 parties avg	4.6	31%
Won	62.8 parties avg	2.8	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Muralli Rajaram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(35%)	35%
Partial	5(29%)	29%
Won	6(35%)	35%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	292,021.43	32,446.839 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Alternative Advisors Investments v Asidokona Mining: Ratification of Loan Agreement 06 Feb 2024 Alternative Advisors Investments Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	06 Feb 2024	Alternative Advisors Investments Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondents.
2	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd v Debtor: Assignment, Set-Off & Insolvency 23 Nov 2023 Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Applicant)Partial	23 Nov 2023	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Applicant): Declaration granted in partDeclaration granted in prayer 1 of the application but limited to the Second Assignment and the Vessel [B] Claims.
3	2253 Apparel Inc v Medico Titan Pte Ltd: Contract Formation, Misrepresentation, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy 18 Apr 2023 Medico Titan Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	18 Apr 2023	Medico Titan Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs awarded to the defendant.
4	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Applicant)Partial	13 Mar 2022	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (Applicant): PartialThe court held that the judicial management expenses principle generally did not apply to the claims arising out of the vessels that were the subject of SUM 2085, subject to certain exceptions. Costs were awarded to Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Alternative Advisors Investments v Asidokona Mining Resources: Striking Out & Disclosure 17 Jun 2020 Supreme Star Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Jun 2020	Supreme Star Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim struck offThe second plaintiff did not file any appeal of its own. Since the Unless Order was not complied with by the stipulated deadline, the plaintiffs’ claim was struck off accordingly.
6	Neptune Capital v Sunmax: Damages for Injunction & Undertaking Breach 27 Jul 2016 CHINA DATA SYSTEM INVESTMENTS PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jul 2016	CHINA DATA SYSTEM INVESTMENTS PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims were struck out and they were found jointly and severally liable to pay damages to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Nithia v Buthmanaban: Proprietary Estoppel & Purchase Money Resulting Trust Dispute 18 Oct 2015 KRISHNAVANNY D/O VAITHILINGAM THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PONNUSAMY SIVAPAKIAM, DECEASED (Respondent, Defendant)Won	18 Oct 2015	KRISHNAVANNY D/O VAITHILINGAM THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PONNUSAMY SIVAPAKIAM, DECEASED (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the part of the Judgment holding that the plaintiff was entitled to relief on the ground of proprietary estoppel was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Contractual Indemnity and Third-Party Costs 02 Jul 2015 Telemedia Pacific Group Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Jul 2015	Telemedia Pacific Group Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedTelemedia's claim against Credit Agricole was dismissed, and Telemedia was ordered to pay Credit Agricole's costs on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Buthmanaban v Krishnavanny: Proprietary Estoppel & Beneficial Interest in Intestate Estate 03 Feb 2015 Krishnavanny d/o Vaithilingam (administratrix of the estate of Ponnusamy Sivapakiam, deceased) (Defendant)Partial	03 Feb 2015	Krishnavanny d/o Vaithilingam (administratrix of the estate of Ponnusamy Sivapakiam, deceased) (Defendant): Claim partially successful againstThe plaintiff's claim was partially successful against the first defendant, with the plaintiff being awarded 21.43% of the net sale proceeds of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Lim Ah Sia v Tiong Tuang Yeong: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Breach of Duty 30 Jul 2014 Lim Ah Sia (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2014	Lim Ah Sia (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffTiong is to purchase Lim’s shares in the Company at the price of $292,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Tan Chi Min v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc: Open Justice & Access to Court Documents in Wrongful Dismissal Case 19 Aug 2013 Tan Chi Min (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Aug 2013	Tan Chi Min (Plaintiff): Sealing order dischargedSealing order discharged, allowing eventual access to court documents after they are admitted as evidence.
12	Communication Design International Ltd v Swarovski Management Pte Ltd: Breach of Oral Agreement Dispute 28 Apr 2011 Swarovski Management Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Apr 2011	Swarovski Management Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of Swarovski Management. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Animal Concerns Research & Education Society v ANA Contractor: Construction Delay, Defective Backfill, and Negligence Claim 16 Mar 2010 Animal Concerns Research & Education Society (Plaintiff)Partial	16 Mar 2010	Animal Concerns Research & Education Society (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgmentInterlocutory judgment against the first defendant with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
14	Ng Hock Kon v Sembawang Capital: Mortgage Enforcement, Notice of Default & Relief from Forfeiture 19 Oct 2009 Sembawang Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	19 Oct 2009	Sembawang Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed because the Notice of Default was not properly served, and the Deed was not properly terminated.
15	George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George: Testamentary Capacity of Schizophrenic Testator 02 Apr 2009 Jacob George (Respondent)Lost	02 Apr 2009	Jacob George (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Paul De Fries v Noble Group Ltd: Share Option Scheme Dispute 17 Feb 2009 Noble Group Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	17 Feb 2009	Noble Group Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe defendant successfully defended the appeal.