Muthu Arusu

Muthu Arusu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banker’s set-off and apparent bias. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 36% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Muthu Arusu has demonstrated expertise across 149 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banker’s set-off	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apparent bias	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of main contract terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract of Affreightment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of condition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Requirements for waiver by election	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Communication of choice to affirm contract in clear and unequivocal terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Completion Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts of indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bars to rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mashed Potato Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effect of Illegality of Related Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ground for termination of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Court’s powers over release of security after final award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effect of counterclaim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Separability Doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ancillary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Design and build contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-incorporation contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hire-Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procurement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Impossibility of Performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-reliance clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contra Proferentem Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fundamental Change of Circumstances	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Franchise Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Contractual Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
No-Assignment Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-Solicitation Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Variation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tortious Interference	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Sum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Interference with Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bunker Supply Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hotel Operations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conclusive Evidence Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Independent Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income Tax Board of Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Supplemental Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certificate of registration of charge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customer Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forged document	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interrogatories	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reinsurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Muthu Arusu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Muthu Arusu has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	8 cases	57% of cases	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech(May 2007) Credit Suisse v Lim Soon Fang Bryan: Examination of Witnesses in Foreign Jurisdiction(Apr 2007) Pertamina Energy Trading v Credit Suisse: Fraudulent Drawdown & Banker's Set-Off(Aug 2006)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	21% of cases	Oriental Insurance v Reliance National: Compound Interest & Adjudication(Dec 2008) Raffles Town Club v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Income Tax Board of Review Appointment(Mar 2008) Tan Joy Hon v Sassoon Samuel: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Authority Dispute(Nov 2007)
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 cases	7% of cases	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Apr 2011)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	7% of cases	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Allen and Gledhill	1 cases	7% of cases	Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd v Credit Suisse: Banker's Set-Off and Authority to Draw Down on Credit Facility(Jan 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Muthu Arusu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 5 (36%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.7 parties avg	4.7	14%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	21%
Won	95.7 parties avg	5.7	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2001	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	310.5 parties avg	10.5
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Muthu Arusu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(14%)	14%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Won	9(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2008	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply 29 May 2014 Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	29 May 2014	Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below. SK is to make payment to ACS for all the RMC supplied by ACS, but the cost of SK procuring sand for ACS to produce RMC should be deducted from any such sums which SK owes ACS. Any RMC supplied by ACS to SK prior to 6 February 2007 will be assessed at the rates stipulated in the Contracts. With respect to the RMC supplied by ACS after the Sand Ban and from 6 February 2007 onwards, we grant ACS’s prayer for payment from SK of a reasonable sum, to be assessed on a restitutionary quantum meruit and/or valebat basis. All the aforementioned sums should be assessed by the Registrar. Interest on the assessed sums is awarded at the rate of 3% per annum from the date of filing of the writ to the date of assessment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Airtrust: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 10 Apr 2011 Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant)Partial	10 Apr 2011	Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn (Plaintiff, Applicant): Leave to commence derivative proceedings granted in partLeave granted to commence derivative proceedings on claims related to KSCCI, Ribands, and Mega-Bond.
3	Oriental Insurance v Reliance National: Compound Interest & Adjudication 21 Dec 2008 Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	21 Dec 2008	Reliance National Asia Re Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application allowed in partDetermination remitted to the Independent Adjudicator for re-determination.
4	Raffles Town Club v Comptroller of Income Tax: Judicial Review of Income Tax Board of Review Appointment 31 Mar 2008 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	31 Mar 2008	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application allowed in partThe court declared that section 79(3) does not prevent a party from seeking judicial review and that Mr. Chew had a connection with the Club that could give rise to questions concerning his impartiality.
5	Tan Joy Hon v Sassoon Samuel: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Authority Dispute 05 Nov 2007 Bukit Panjang Plaza Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	05 Nov 2007	Bukit Panjang Plaza Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe originating summons was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay indemnity costs to all nine defendants.
6	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech 16 May 2007 BGC International (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	16 May 2007	BGC International (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
7	Credit Suisse v Lim Soon Fang Bryan: Examination of Witnesses in Foreign Jurisdiction 11 Apr 2007 Credit Suisse (Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2007	Credit Suisse (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed.The appeal to set aside the order for examination of witnesses in Taiwan was dismissed, allowing Credit Suisse to proceed with obtaining evidence from the witnesses.
8	Pertamina Energy Trading v Credit Suisse: Fraudulent Drawdown & Banker's Set-Off 14 Aug 2006 Credit Suisse (Respondent)Won	14 Aug 2006	Credit Suisse (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd v Credit Suisse: Banker's Set-Off and Authority to Draw Down on Credit Facility 15 Jan 2006 Credit Suisse (Defendant)Won	15 Jan 2006	Credit Suisse (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.
10	Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore v Singapore Telecommunications Ltd: Discovery & Waiver of Privilege 01 May 2002 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	01 May 2002	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedDefendant's appeal was allowed.
11	Hendrawan Setiadi v OCBC Securities: Res Judicata & Striking Out Claims 30 Sep 2001 OCBC Securities Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Sep 2001	OCBC Securities Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Claim struck out upheldThe court upheld the decision to strike out the plaintiff's claim against OCBC Securities.
12	Hendrawan Setiadi v OCBC Securities: Res Judicata & Negligence Claim 30 Sep 2001 OCBC Securities Private Limited (Respondent)Won	30 Sep 2001	OCBC Securities Private Limited (Respondent): Claim Struck OutThe court upheld the decision to strike out the claim against OCBC Securities.
13	MeesPierson NV v Bay Pacific: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Health Certificate 13 Aug 2000 MeesPierson NV (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Aug 2000	MeesPierson NV (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for misrepresentation and restitution was dismissed.
14	Gaughan v Straits Instrumentation: Negligence, Employer's Duty & Safe Work System 27 Feb 2000 Another (Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2000	Another (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the second defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.