Mylvaganan Mahendran

Mylvaganan Mahendran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Intoxication	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
General exceptions	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Special exceptions	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mylvaganan Mahendran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mylvaganan Mahendran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Surian & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Seah Kok Meng v PP: Provocation & Intoxication in Murder Charge \| Singapore Criminal Law(May 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mylvaganan Mahendran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mylvaganan Mahendran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seah Kok Meng v PP: Provocation & Intoxication in Murder Charge \| Singapore Criminal Law 20 May 2001 Seah Kok Meng (Appellant)Lost	20 May 2001	Seah Kok Meng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for murder was dismissed.