N Ganesan

N Ganesan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in charitable giving and criminal law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

N Ganesan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in charitable giving and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Charitable Giving	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bona vacantia	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

N Ganesan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
N Ganesan and Associates	1 cases	50% of cases	PP v Shanmugam: Importation of Cannabis - Disproving Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2004)
N Ganesan & Associates	1 cases	50% of cases	Will of Samuel Emily: Interpretation of Charitable Gifts & Intestacy(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of N Ganesan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of N Ganesan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Shanmugam: Importation of Cannabis - Disproving Presumptions under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 May 2004 Shanmugam s/o Murugesu (Defendant)Lost	03 May 2004	Shanmugam s/o Murugesu (Defendant): Accused convicted and sentenced to deathThe accused was convicted on the capital charge and sentenced to death.
2	Will of Samuel Emily: Interpretation of Charitable Gifts & Intestacy 08 Oct 2001 Cho Sui Lan (Applicant, Executrix, Trustee)Partial	08 Oct 2001	Cho Sui Lan (Applicant, Executrix, Trustee): Orders made in favor of applicantOrders made in relation to the construction of the will.