N Screenivasan

N Screenivasan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and fiduciary duties. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

N Screenivasan has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Car Park Systems	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Technology	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cashless Payment Systems	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	N Screenivasan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

N Screenivasan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	John While Springs v Goh Sai Chuah: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Damages Assessment(Jul 2004) OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Conspiracy, Fraud & Mareva Injunction(May 2004)
Derrick Ravi Partnership	1 cases	33% of cases	Stratech Systems v Guthrie Properties: Breach of Confidence & Passing Off in Car Park System(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of N Screenivasan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 17.9
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	29.0 parties avg	9.0	67%
Neutral	120.0 parties avg	20.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	218.9 parties avg	18.9

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of N Screenivasan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	70,850.00	35,425.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	John While Springs v Goh Sai Chuah: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Damages Assessment 15 Jul 2004 Cheong Shze Fun (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2004	Cheong Shze Fun (Defendant): Repayment of bonuses orderedOrdered to repay bonuses of $14,600 with interest at 6% (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	OCM Opportunities Fund II v Burhan Uray: Conspiracy, Fraud & Mareva Injunction 31 May 2004 Handforth Profits Limited (Defendant)Neutral	31 May 2004	Handforth Profits Limited (Defendant): Application to strike out claim dismissedApplication to strike out claim dismissed.
3	Stratech Systems v Guthrie Properties: Breach of Confidence & Passing Off in Car Park System 19 Apr 2001 Stratech Systems Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Apr 2001	Stratech Systems Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's action for breach of confidence and passing off was dismissed.