Nadesan Ganesan

Nadesan Ganesan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and misuse of drugs act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Possession of Drugs	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nadesan Ganesan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nadesan Ganesan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chan Kwek & Chong	1 cases	50% of cases	Teo Cheow Kim v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Chain of Custody(Jan 2008)
N Ganesan & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Jingga bin Md Selamat v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Knowledge of Drug Possession(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nadesan Ganesan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nadesan Ganesan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo Cheow Kim v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Chain of Custody 15 Jan 2008 Teo Cheow Kim (Appellant)Lost	15 Jan 2008	Teo Cheow Kim (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence for trafficking diamorphine was dismissed.
2	Jingga bin Md Selamat v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Knowledge of Drug Possession 29 Apr 2001 Jingga bin Md Selamat alias Kwan Ah Chiam (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2001	Jingga bin Md Selamat alias Kwan Ah Chiam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.