Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain

Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in sentencing and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Sentencing	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Youthful Offenders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Rape	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Disability	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abnormality of Mind	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kalco Law LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Public Prosecutor v ASR: Sentencing of Young Offender with Intellectual Disability for Rape & Sexual Assault(Apr 2018) Public Prosecutor v Rosdi Bin Joenet: Culpable Homicide Sentencing(Apr 2016)
August Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Damodaran v Rogini: Determining Property Share in Resulting Trust After Joint Tenant's Death(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nadia Ui Mhuimhneachain's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Other	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Damodaran v Rogini: Determining Property Share in Resulting Trust After Joint Tenant's Death 06 Sep 2020 Damodaran s/o Subbarayan (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Sep 2020	Damodaran s/o Subbarayan (Plaintiff): PartialThe Plaintiff was determined to have a 45.35% share in the property.
2	Public Prosecutor v ASR: Sentencing of Young Offender with Intellectual Disability for Rape & Sexual Assault 19 Apr 2018 ASR (Defendant)Other	19 Apr 2018	ASR (Defendant): Sentenced to Reformative TrainingThe Accused was sentenced to Reformative Training.
3	Public Prosecutor v Rosdi Bin Joenet: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 12 Apr 2016 Rosdi Bin Joenet (Defendant)Lost	12 Apr 2016	Rosdi Bin Joenet (Defendant): ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to 9 years' imprisonment, backdated to the date of remand.