Naidu Priyalatha

Naidu Priyalatha is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Caveat	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Naidu Priyalatha has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Naidu Priyalatha has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advocatus Law LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Tonghuai @ Nanhang Pte Ltd v Teo Fook Keong: Application for Leave to Commence Proceedings Against Bankrupt under IRDA(May 2023) Simran Bedi v Mark A Montgomery: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer Dispute(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Naidu Priyalatha's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Naidu Priyalatha's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	377,190.00	188,595.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tonghuai @ Nanhang Pte Ltd v Teo Fook Keong: Application for Leave to Commence Proceedings Against Bankrupt under IRDA 09 May 2023 Tonghuai @ Nanhang Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	09 May 2023	Tonghuai @ Nanhang Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication to commence proceedings against the respondent was allowed. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Simran Bedi v Mark A Montgomery: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer Dispute 30 Mar 2022 Mark A Montgomery (Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2022	Mark A Montgomery (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDamages awarded against the Defendant in the amount of S$377,190 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).