Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir

Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and family law. Their track record shows a 13.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated expertise across 49 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenants-in-common	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial contribution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ancillary powers of court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial relief after foreign divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Case Disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Nakoorsha Law Corporation	6 cases	75% of cases	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute(Oct 2024) Khoo Jee Chek v Lim Beng Tiong: Equitable Accounting, Co-owned Property, Mortgage Loan Repayments(Jul 2024) Attorney-General v. Shahira Banu: Legal Profession - Duty of Candour in Admission to the Bar(May 2024)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	13% of cases	Goldring v. PP: Access to Seized Documents & Fair Trial Rights(Apr 2013)
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	1 cases	13% of cases	UFM v UFN: Financial Relief After Foreign Divorce & Interpretation of Women's Charter Chapter 4A(Sep 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.8 parties avg	2.8	63%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nakoorsha bin Abdul Kadir's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(63%)	63%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Won	1(13%)	13%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	54,000.00	18,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute 09 Oct 2024 Lee Cheng Ling (Applicant)Lost	09 Oct 2024	Lee Cheng Ling (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed; ordered to bear costs of $34,000 jointly and severally with Mr. Lim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Khoo Jee Chek v Lim Beng Tiong: Equitable Accounting, Co-owned Property, Mortgage Loan Repayments 16 Jul 2024 Khoo Jee Chek (Appellant)Partial	16 Jul 2024	Khoo Jee Chek (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; Mr. Khoo awarded costs of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Attorney-General v. Shahira Banu: Legal Profession - Duty of Candour in Admission to the Bar 01 May 2024 Shahira Banu d/o Khaja Moinudeen (Respondent)Lost	01 May 2024	Shahira Banu d/o Khaja Moinudeen (Respondent): Struck off the RollThe Respondent was struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors.
4	Khoo Jee Chek v Lim Beng Tiong: Constructive & Resulting Trusts in Property Purchase 22 Aug 2023 Khoo Jee Chek (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Aug 2023	Khoo Jee Chek (Plaintiff): PartialThe court determined that Khoo held 38.38% of the beneficial interest in the Property. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
5	Public Prosecutor v CEP: Abetment by Conspiracy to Commit Rape Sentencing 12 Jan 2022 CEP (Defendant)Lost	12 Jan 2022	CEP (Defendant): Sentence imposedThe accused was sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment.
6	PP v Kong Swee Eng: Corruption Charges & Special Relationship Defence in Jurong Shipyard Case 12 Jan 2022 Kong Swee Eng (Respondent)Lost	12 Jan 2022	Kong Swee Eng (Respondent): Conviction on Several ChargesConvicted on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 11th charges. Appeal dismissed as regards the 7th and 10th charges.
7	UFM v UFN: Financial Relief After Foreign Divorce & Interpretation of Women's Charter Chapter 4A 21 Sep 2017 UFM (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	21 Sep 2017	UFM (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; wife granted leave to proceed with her application for financial relief.
8	Goldring v. PP: Access to Seized Documents & Fair Trial Rights 24 Apr 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	24 Apr 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe respondent's arguments were rejected and the application was allowed.