Nandakumar Ponniya

Nandakumar Ponniya is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Ponniya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nandakumar Ponniya has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	CHH v CHI: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Stone Supply Dispute(Dec 2020) Mukherjee Amitava v Dystar Global Holdings: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Companies Act(Sep 2018) Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act(May 2018)
Wong Partnership	1 cases	25% of cases	Low Hua Kin v Kumagai-Zenecon: Director's Breach of Duty & Provisional Liquidator's Sale of Shares(Jul 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nandakumar Ponniya's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nandakumar Ponniya's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CHH v CHI: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Stone Supply Dispute 20 Dec 2020 CHH (Respondent)Won	20 Dec 2020	CHH (Respondent): Application for sealing and redaction grantedThe Respondent's application for sealing and redaction was granted.
2	Mukherjee Amitava v Dystar Global Holdings: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Companies Act 05 Sep 2018 Yao Jianfang (Respondent)Neutral	05 Sep 2018	Yao Jianfang (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed regarding the joinder of the Longsheng directors. No order for costs in favour of them in respect of the dismissal of the part of the appeal that pertains to joinder. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Nippon Catalyst v PT Trans-Pacific: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 21 May 2018 PT Pertamina (Persero) (Defendant, Respondent)Won	21 May 2018	PT Pertamina (Persero) (Defendant, Respondent): Joint Tortfeasor Claim stayedThe Joint Tortfeasor Claim against Pertamina was stayed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Low Hua Kin v Kumagai-Zenecon: Director's Breach of Duty & Provisional Liquidator's Sale of Shares 27 Jul 2000 Low Hua Kin (Appellant)Lost	27 Jul 2000	Low Hua Kin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.