Nandakumar Renganathan

Nandakumar Renganathan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in landlord and tenant law and property law. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nandakumar Renganathan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nandakumar Renganathan has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
T M Hoon and Co	2 cases	29% of cases	OTO Bodycare v Hiew: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off of Electro-Reflexology Apparatus(Jul 2005) Transbilt Engineering v Finebuild Systems: Garnishee Order and Winding Up in Insolvency Law(Jul 2005)
RHTLaw Asia LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	D&R Asset Management v Taiyo Asset Management: Loan Repayment & Contractual Obligations(Feb 2021)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	CIFG v Polimet: Summary Judgment & Striking Out Application on Bond Subscription Agreement & Indemnity Clause(Apr 2014)
RHT Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	14% of cases	Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd v Riway: Option to Purchase, HDB Approval, and Rescission(Jan 2015)
KhattarWong	1 cases	14% of cases	Chiam Heng Luan v Chiam Heng Hsien: Proprietary Estoppel & Termination of Leases(Aug 2007)
Wee Ramayah & Partners	1 cases	14% of cases	Citrus World Inc v Neotrade Marketing: Wrongful Termination of Distributorship Agreement(Dec 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nandakumar Renganathan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Neutral	113.0 parties avg	13.0	14%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	32.5 parties avg	2.5	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nandakumar Renganathan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4
USD	380,000.00	380,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	D&R Asset Management v Taiyo Asset Management: Loan Repayment & Contractual Obligations 16 Feb 2021 D&R Asset Management Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Feb 2021	D&R Asset Management Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; repayment of US$380,000 plus interest.
2	Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd v Riway: Option to Purchase, HDB Approval, and Rescission 19 Jan 2015 Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2015	Hoy Fatt Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claims DismissedHoy Fatt’s claims for specific performance and damages were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	CIFG v Polimet: Summary Judgment & Striking Out Application on Bond Subscription Agreement & Indemnity Clause 15 Apr 2014 Others (Defendant)Won	15 Apr 2014	Others (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Chiam Heng Luan v Chiam Heng Hsien: Proprietary Estoppel & Termination of Leases 20 Aug 2007 Ong Soo Yong (Defendant)Neutral	20 Aug 2007	Ong Soo Yong (Defendant): NeutralAgreed to the sale of the Property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	OTO Bodycare v Hiew: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off of Electro-Reflexology Apparatus 26 Jul 2005 OTO Bodycare Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Jul 2005	OTO Bodycare Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partThe court found Hiew Keat Foong liable for trademark infringement and passing off for specific periods, granting an injunction and ordering damages to be assessed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
6	Transbilt Engineering v Finebuild Systems: Garnishee Order and Winding Up in Insolvency Law 10 Jul 2005 Transbilt Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant)Won	10 Jul 2005	Transbilt Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed.
7	Citrus World Inc v Neotrade Marketing: Wrongful Termination of Distributorship Agreement 29 Dec 2000 Neotrade Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Dec 2000	Neotrade Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim for wrongful termination of distributorship agreement was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).