Natalie Chang

Natalie Chang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Natalie Chang has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreements	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Natalie Chang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Natalie Chang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bernard & Rada Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	Seet Poh v Lim Lee Cheng: Division of Matrimonial Assets Dispute(Apr 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Natalie Chang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Natalie Chang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seet Poh v Lim Lee Cheng: Division of Matrimonial Assets Dispute 16 Apr 2014 Seet Poh (Petitioner, Appellant)Lost	16 Apr 2014	Seet Poh (Petitioner, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPetitioner's appeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed. No order as to costs was made.