Navin Kripalani

Navin Kripalani is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in assessment of legal costs and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Navin Kripalani has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in costs and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Costs	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Tower Crane Rental	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Navin Kripalani has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Navin Kripalani has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ACIES Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	Kimly Construction v Lee Tong Boon: Tower Crane Collapse & Breach of Contract(Jan 2011) Wong Chong Yue v Wong Chong Thai: Dispute over Express Trust and Loan Recoverability(Jan 2011) Stansfield Group v Acies Law: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills of Costs Dispute(Oct 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Navin Kripalani's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Navin Kripalani's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kimly Construction v Lee Tong Boon: Tower Crane Collapse & Breach of Contract 27 Jan 2011 FES Engineering Pte Ltd (Fourth Party)Won	27 Jan 2011	FES Engineering Pte Ltd (Fourth Party): Claim DismissedClaim against the fourth party dismissed.
2	Wong Chong Yue v Wong Chong Thai: Dispute over Express Trust and Loan Recoverability 10 Jan 2011 Wong Chong Thai (Defendant)Won	10 Jan 2011	Wong Chong Thai (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's action against the defendant was dismissed, with costs to be taxed to the defendant.
3	Stansfield Group v Acies Law: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills of Costs Dispute 07 Oct 2010 Acies Law Corp (Defendant)Partial	07 Oct 2010	Acies Law Corp (Defendant): Application allowed in partApplication to tax the third and fourth bills was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.