Navin Lobo

Navin Lobo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Navin Lobo has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Indefeasibility of Title	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Navin Lobo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Navin Lobo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	4 cases	100% of cases	Agrosin Pte Ltd v Martynov Igor: Breach of Director's Duties, Understated Costs, and Unpaid Salary Dispute(Jun 2009) Malayan Banking Berhad v Sivakolunthu Thirunavukarasu: Indefeasibility of Title & Mortgage Fraud(Sep 2007) Progen Engineering v Winter Engineering: Arbitrator Fees & Appeal Delay in Construction Subcontract Dispute(Dec 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Navin Lobo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.3 parties avg	4.3	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Navin Lobo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	323,950.71	161,975.362 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Agrosin Pte Ltd v Martynov Igor: Breach of Director's Duties, Understated Costs, and Unpaid Salary Dispute 25 Jun 2009 Martynov Igor (Defendant)Partial	25 Jun 2009	Martynov Igor (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for unpaid salary allowed with interest at 5.33% from 29 March 2007. The currency is SGD as the salary was claimed in SGD.
2	Malayan Banking Berhad v Sivakolunthu Thirunavukarasu: Indefeasibility of Title & Mortgage Fraud 27 Sep 2007 Sim Ah Ban (Defendant)Lost	27 Sep 2007	Sim Ah Ban (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendants’ counter-claim is dismissed.
3	Progen Engineering v Winter Engineering: Arbitrator Fees & Appeal Delay in Construction Subcontract Dispute 07 Dec 2006 Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	07 Dec 2006	Progen Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for leave to appeal and extension of time was dismissed.
4	Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall: Unilateral Mistake in Online Contracts 12 Jan 2005 Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	12 Jan 2005	Digilandmall.com Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; the appellants shall bear two-thirds of the taxed costs of the trial. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).