Nawaz Kamil

Nawaz Kamil is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in chancery and equity and fiduciary duties.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share of Profit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nawaz Kamil has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nawaz Kamil has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Providence Law Asia LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	PT Bank OCBC NISP Tbk v Emerging Asia Real Estate Fund Pte Ltd: Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment, Breach of Contract(Mar 2022) TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act(Jul 2020) Griffin Real Estate v. ERC Unicampus: Account of Profits for Big Hotel Sale(Oct 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nawaz Kamil's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nawaz Kamil's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	3(75%)	75%
Withdrawn	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Withdrawn: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PT Bank OCBC NISP Tbk v Emerging Asia Real Estate Fund Pte Ltd: Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment, Breach of Contract 14 Mar 2022 Emerging Asia Real Estate Fund Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	14 Mar 2022	Emerging Asia Real Estate Fund Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to amend Statement of Claim allowed in partThe court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the Statement of Claim in part.
2	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act 27 Jul 2020 Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant)Withdrawn	27 Jul 2020	Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant): Application DiscontinuedApplication against the second defendant was discontinued due to a settlement.
3	Griffin Real Estate v. ERC Unicampus: Account of Profits for Big Hotel Sale 23 Oct 2019 Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	23 Oct 2019	Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartThe court allowed the appeal in part by modifying the formula for computing the net profit. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
4	Griffin Real Estate v ERC Unicampus: Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Account for Third Party Liability 17 Dec 2018 Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Dec 2018	Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Declarations granted in part; account of profits orderedDeclarations granted that ERCU knowingly received $10m in breach of fiduciary duties and is liable to account for profits. The amount of profits is to be computed according to the formula provided by the court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.