Nazim Khan

Nazim Khan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial management and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nazim Khan has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Earnest Money	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Memorandum of Understanding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nazim Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nazim Khan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	5 cases	56% of cases	Symphony Ventures v DNB Bank: Amendment of Pleadings and Limitation Periods in Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, and Conspiracy Claims(Oct 2021) Wan Lai Ting v Kea Kah Kim: Share Ownership Dispute and Alleged Breach of Contract(Feb 2015) Chow Tat Ming Henry v Kea Kah Kim: Oral Agreement, Share Purchase, and Loss Compensation Dispute(Feb 2015)
Colin Ng & Partners	2 cases	22% of cases	Re Boonann Construction: Judicial Management, Mortgage Redemption, and Interest Accrual(Jul 2000) Re Boonann Construction: Judicial Management, Mortgage Redemption & Interest Owed(Jul 2000)
PDLegal LLC	1 cases	11% of cases	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute(Oct 2024)
Chan Ng Aqbal	1 cases	11% of cases	Tjiang v Choy: Dispute over Yuan Guang Assets Purchase & MOU Bindingness(Jun 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nazim Khan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.3 parties avg	3.3	56%
Unknown	14.0 parties avg	4.0	11%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nazim Khan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(56%)	56%
Unknown	1(11%)	11%
Won	3(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	56,400.00	9,400.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Cheng Ling v Argyle Fund Investments: Resulting & Constructive Trusts Dispute 09 Oct 2024 Lim Chih Li @ Jared Lim Chih Li (Respondent)Lost	09 Oct 2024	Lim Chih Li @ Jared Lim Chih Li (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication dismissed; ordered to bear costs of $34,000 jointly and severally with Mdm. Lee (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Symphony Ventures v DNB Bank: Amendment of Pleadings and Limitation Periods in Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, and Conspiracy Claims 31 Oct 2021 Symphony Ventures Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	31 Oct 2021	Symphony Ventures Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Symphony Ventures to pay costs of the appeal to the respondent fixed at $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Wan Lai Ting v Kea Kah Kim: Share Ownership Dispute and Alleged Breach of Contract 08 Feb 2015 Kea Kah Kim (Defendant)Won	08 Feb 2015	Kea Kah Kim (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
4	Chow Tat Ming Henry v Kea Kah Kim: Oral Agreement, Share Purchase, and Loss Compensation Dispute 08 Feb 2015 Kea Kah Kim (Defendant)Won	08 Feb 2015	Kea Kah Kim (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Wan Lai Ting v Kea Kah Kim: Hearsay Evidence, Section 32 Evidence Act & Order 38 Rule 2(1) Rules of Court 14 Sep 2014 Kea Kah Kim (Defendant)Won	14 Sep 2014	Kea Kah Kim (Defendant): Application OpposedDefendant successfully opposed the Plaintiff's application to admit hearsay evidence and was awarded costs for the summons.
6	Tao Commodity Trader Inc v Fortis Bank: Service of Writ on Foreign Company 18 Feb 2004 Tao Commodity Trader Inc (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Feb 2004	Tao Commodity Trader Inc (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe application to validate the service of writ was dismissed.
7	Tjiang v Choy: Dispute over Yuan Guang Assets Purchase & MOU Bindingness 29 Jun 2002 Yin Kum Choy (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2002	Yin Kum Choy (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed. Costs shall be recovered from the first defendant, as undertaken by him at the commencement of the hearing in these proceedings. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Re Boonann Construction: Judicial Management, Mortgage Redemption, and Interest Accrual 05 Jul 2000 Boonann Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)	05 Jul 2000	Boonann Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): -
9	Re Boonann Construction: Judicial Management, Mortgage Redemption & Interest Owed 05 Jul 2000 Chew Kia Ngee (Applicant)Lost	05 Jul 2000	Chew Kia Ngee (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for a declaration that interest ceased to run on the date of the judicial management order was dismissed. The company was ordered to pay the legal costs of the bank in connection with the application which was fixed at $800 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).