Nedumaran Muthukrishnan

Nedumaran Muthukrishnan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nedumaran Muthukrishnan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M Nedumaran & Co	6 cases	75% of cases	Naughty G Pte Ltd v Fortune Marketing Pte Ltd: Oral Contract Dispute over Distributorship Agreement(Sep 2018) PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2016) Lee Seng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee: Striking Out Application for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Minority Oppression(Jan 2015)
K Krishna & Partners	2 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case(Mar 2011) Stansfield Group v Acies Law: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills of Costs Dispute(Oct 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nedumaran Muthukrishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	63%
Partial	34.4 parties avg	4.4	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nedumaran Muthukrishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(63%)	63%
Partial	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	125,561.23	62,780.622 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Naughty G Pte Ltd v Fortune Marketing Pte Ltd: Oral Contract Dispute over Distributorship Agreement 02 Sep 2018 Fortune Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 Sep 2018	Fortune Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of $125,561.23 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Ragunath Nair A/L Janartan (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Ragunath Nair A/L Janartan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely, diamorphine.
3	Lee Seng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee: Striking Out Application for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Minority Oppression 05 Jan 2015 Goh York Quee Bernard (Defendant)Partial	05 Jan 2015	Goh York Quee Bernard (Defendant): Application to Strike Out Granted in PartDefendant's application to strike out the Statement of Claim was granted in part.
4	Lee Seng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee: Striking Out Application for Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Minority Oppression 05 Jan 2015 N M Solution Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	05 Jan 2015	N M Solution Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to Strike Out Granted in PartDefendant's application to strike out the Statement of Claim was granted in part.
5	Public Prosecutor v Tan Khoon Shan Terrance: Sentencing Appeal for Telecommunications Act Offences 03 Sep 2012 Tan Khoon Shan Terrance (Respondent)Lost	03 Sep 2012	Tan Khoon Shan Terrance (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe respondent's sentence was enhanced from 15 months to 30 months imprisonment.
6	Win-Win Aluminium v Law Society: Complaint Against Solicitor for False Evidence 06 Jun 2012 Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	06 Jun 2012	Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Application dismissedWin-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd's application to direct the Law Society to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a Disciplinary Tribunal in respect of its complaint was dismissed with costs.
7	Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case 24 Mar 2011 Quek Hock Lye (Defendant)Lost	24 Mar 2011	Quek Hock Lye (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
8	Stansfield Group v Acies Law: Taxation of Solicitor's Bills of Costs Dispute 07 Oct 2010 The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (trading as Stansfield College (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Oct 2010	The Stansfield Group Pte Ltd (trading as Stansfield College (Plaintiff): Application dismissed in partApplication to tax the first two bills was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.