Neo Kim Cheng Monica

Neo Kim Cheng Monica is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Neo Kim Cheng Monica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Neo Kim Cheng Monica has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chan Neo LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Facade Solution v Mero Asia Pacific: Setting Aside Adjudication for Fraud under SOPA(Sep 2020) CFA v CFB: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Fraud under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act(May 2020)
TSMP Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Doo Ree Engineering v Taisei Corp: SOP Act & Permissibility of Repeat Payment Claims(Sep 2009)
Chan Tan LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Tan Chiang v Permasteelisa: Leave to Appeal & Extension of Time for Service(Apr 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Neo Kim Cheng Monica's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Neo Kim Cheng Monica's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Facade Solution v Mero Asia Pacific: Setting Aside Adjudication for Fraud under SOPA 06 Sep 2020 Mero Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Sep 2020	Mero Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment AffirmedHigh Court's decision to set aside the adjudication determination was affirmed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD for Singapore).
2	CFA v CFB: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Fraud under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 18 May 2020 CFB (Respondent)Won	18 May 2020	CFB (Respondent): Application to set aside the adjudication determination grantedCFB's application to set aside the adjudication determination was granted.
3	Doo Ree Engineering v Taisei Corp: SOP Act & Permissibility of Repeat Payment Claims 24 Sep 2009 Doo Ree Engineering & Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	24 Sep 2009	Doo Ree Engineering & Trading Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. Costs of $4,000 and reasonable disbursements were awarded to Taisei. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Chiang v Permasteelisa: Leave to Appeal & Extension of Time for Service 03 Apr 2002 Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd (Respondent)Lost	03 Apr 2002	Permasteelisa Pacific Holdings Ltd (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the notice of appeal was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).