Netto

Netto is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and statutory demand.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Netto has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and statutory demand.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Mortgagee in Possession	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Netto has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Anand T & Co	1 cases	100% of cases	Goh Chin Soon v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation: Setting Aside Statutory Demand Under Bankruptcy Act(Jan 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Netto's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Netto's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Chin Soon v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation: Setting Aside Statutory Demand Under Bankruptcy Act 29 Jan 2001 Goh Chin Soon (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jan 2001	Goh Chin Soon (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to allow bankruptcy proceedings was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).