Ng Kai Ling

Ng Kai Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Kai Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Kai Ling has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LIMN Law Corporation	3 cases	100% of cases	H P Construction v Mega Team: Interpretation of SOPA s 13(3)(a) Adjudication Application Deadline(Feb 2024) H P Construction v Mega Team: SOPA Adjudication Application Timeline Dispute(Oct 2023) Lee Bee Eng v Cheng William: Joinder and Substitution of Parties in Construction Dispute(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Kai Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Kai Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	49,400.00	16,466.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	H P Construction v Mega Team: Interpretation of SOPA s 13(3)(a) Adjudication Application Deadline 14 Feb 2024 H P Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	14 Feb 2024	H P Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $30,400 inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders applied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	H P Construction v Mega Team: SOPA Adjudication Application Timeline Dispute 22 Oct 2023 H P Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	22 Oct 2023	H P Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application dismissedClaimant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the claimant was ordered to pay costs of $13,000 to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lee Bee Eng v Cheng William: Joinder and Substitution of Parties in Construction Dispute 30 Sep 2020 Lee Bee Eng (formerly trading as AFCO East Development) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	30 Sep 2020	Lee Bee Eng (formerly trading as AFCO East Development) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partRegistrar's Appeal No 363 of 2019 allowed in part; AFCO be substituted as plaintiff for the Sole Proprietor pursuant to O 15 r 6(2)(a) and r 6(2)(b)(i) of the Rules of Court. Costs of both appeals in favour of Ms Lee, fixed at $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).