Ng Lip Chee

Ng Lip Chee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and mareva injunctions. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in asset recovery and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Asset Recovery	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Remittance Services	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed Money Changer	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Lip Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Lip Chee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
NLC Law Asia LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Lyu Yan v Lim Tien Chiang: Injunction for Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Unjust Enrichment(Jan 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Lip Chee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Lip Chee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lyu Yan v Lim Tien Chiang: Injunction for Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Unjust Enrichment 21 Jan 2019 Lyu Yan @ Lu Yan (Plaintiff)Won	21 Jan 2019	Lyu Yan @ Lu Yan (Plaintiff): Injunction grantedThe plaintiff was granted an injunction against the defendants.