Ng Rui Wen

Ng Rui Wen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in disciplinary proceedings and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in disciplinary proceedings and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Disciplinary Proceedings	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Touting	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Rui Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Rui Wen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Disciplinary Tribunal's Duty to Investigate Touting Charges(Jan 2025) Law Society of Singapore v Kasturibai: Disciplinary Proceedings for False Attestation in Property Sale(Feb 2024) Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Touting Allegations(Jan 2024)
TSMP Law Corporation	1 cases	20% of cases	Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v Ok Tedi Mining Ltd: Striking Out, Fiduciary Relationships, Unlawful Means Conspiracies(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Rui Wen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.6
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	114.0 parties avg	14.0	20%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Rui Wen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	5,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Disciplinary Tribunal's Duty to Investigate Touting Charges 12 Jan 2025 The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	12 Jan 2025	The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Order to apply for a new Disciplinary TribunalThe court ordered the Law Society to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of another Disciplinary Tribunal to hear and investigate the matter.
2	Law Society of Singapore v Kasturibai: Disciplinary Proceedings for False Attestation in Property Sale 27 Feb 2024 The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	27 Feb 2024	The Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedThe Law Society's application was granted, and Ms. Kasturibai was ordered to pay costs of $10,000 inclusive of disbursements to the Law Society. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Touting Allegations 30 Jan 2024 The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	30 Jan 2024	The Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Determination acceptedThe Council accepted the Determination on the issue of liability.
4	Neverland Investment Holdings Pte Ltd v P.T Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Default Judgment 19 Jan 2023 Ravinder Paul Singh s/o Akubal Singh (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	19 Jan 2023	Ravinder Paul Singh s/o Akubal Singh (Defendant, Appellant): Security amount reducedThe court reduced the amount of security to be furnished.
5	Ok Tedi Fly River Development Foundation Ltd v Ok Tedi Mining Ltd: Striking Out, Fiduciary Relationships, Unlawful Means Conspiracies 11 Apr 2022 Bosi Kasiman (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Apr 2022	Bosi Kasiman (Plaintiff): Claims for breach of fiduciary duties and conspiracy struck outClaims for breach of fiduciary duties and conspiracy were struck out as being obviously unsustainable.