Ng Si Ming

Ng Si Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and recourse against award. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Si Ming has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non-acceptance of goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Si Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Si Ming has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	CNQ v CNR: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Acceptance of Goods(Oct 2022) CNQ v CNR: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Acceptance of Goods(Dec 2021)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Daimler v Front Row: Exclusion of Appeal Rights under Arbitration Act via ICC Rules(Jul 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Si Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Si Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CNQ v CNR: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Acceptance of Goods 30 Oct 2022 CNR (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2022	CNR (Respondent): Application dismissedThe respondent successfully defended against the claimant's application to set aside the second arbitration award.
2	CNQ v CNR: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Acceptance of Goods 27 Dec 2021 CNR (Respondent)Won	27 Dec 2021	CNR (Respondent): Award UpheldThe respondent's arbitration award was upheld; the applicant's application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
3	Daimler v Front Row: Exclusion of Appeal Rights under Arbitration Act via ICC Rules 30 Jul 2012 Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2012	Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Summons allowedFront Row's summons to set aside Daimler's originating summons was allowed.