Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann

Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in intellectual property law and geographical indications.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and intellectual property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Geographical indications	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Qualification of rights	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Wine Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Agreements	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Australian Grape and Wine v Consorzio Prosecco: Geographical Indication Dispute over 'Prosecco' Wine(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Australian Grape and Wine v Consorzio Prosecco: Geographical Indication Dispute over 'Prosecco' Wine 22 Feb 2022 Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco (Respondent)Lost	22 Feb 2022	Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed on the basis of section 41(1)(a) of the Geographical Indications Act (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).