Ng Tee Tze Allen

Ng Tee Tze Allen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in service out of jurisdiction and setting aside. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Tee Tze Allen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Tee Tze Allen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Cosmetic Care Asia Ltd v Sri Linarti Sasmito: Service Out of Jurisdiction Dispute(Jun 2021) LVM Law Chambers LLC v Wan Hoe Keet: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation(Apr 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Tee Tze Allen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Tee Tze Allen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cosmetic Care Asia Ltd v Sri Linarti Sasmito: Service Out of Jurisdiction Dispute 28 Jun 2021 Sri Linarti Sasmito (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2021	Sri Linarti Sasmito (Defendant): Summons dismissedDefendant's application to discharge/set aside the order of an assistant registrar granting the plaintiffs leave to serve the originating process on the defendant out of jurisdiction was dismissed.
2	LVM Law Chambers LLC v Wan Hoe Keet: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation 02 Apr 2020 Ho Sally (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff)Lost	02 Apr 2020	Ho Sally (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.