Ng Wei Jin

Ng Wei Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in litigation and negligence. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Apportionment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contribution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Wei Jin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Lim & Partners LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Value Monetization III Ltd v Lim Beng Choo: Contribution Claim Under Civil Law Act(Nov 2024) The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement(Dec 2023) Value Monetization III Ltd v Lim Beng Choo: Contribution Claims & Limitation Act(Oct 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Wei Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	27.7 parties avg	7.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Wei Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,180,424.87	2,090,212.442 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Value Monetization III Ltd v Lim Beng Choo: Contribution Claim Under Civil Law Act 28 Nov 2024 The Enterprise Fund III Ltd (Claimant)Partial	28 Nov 2024	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd (Claimant): Claim Allowed in PartClaim allowed in part; Ms. Lim ordered to pay $352,301.62 to The Enterprise Fund III Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd v CNPLaw LLP: Negligence Claim Against Lawyers for Flawed Loan Facility Agreement 06 Dec 2023 Value Monetization III Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 Dec 2023	Value Monetization III Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Lenders’ claim against CNP was dismissed.
3	Value Monetization III Ltd v Lim Beng Choo: Contribution Claims & Limitation Act 26 Oct 2023 The Enterprise Fund III Ltd (Respondent, Claimant, Third Party)Won	26 Oct 2023	The Enterprise Fund III Ltd (Respondent, Claimant, Third Party): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in that the third party claim was struck out.