Ng Yong Kiat Francis

Ng Yong Kiat Francis is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and robbery. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Obstruction of Justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prisoners Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Capital Punishment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Yong Kiat Francis has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Yong Kiat Francis has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	100% of cases	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Costs for Unreasonable Applications(Jun 2022) Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Striking Out Contempt Application for Lack of Consent(May 2022) Roslan bin Bakar v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Death Sentences Based on Mental Disability(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Yong Kiat Francis's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 12.6
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Won	414.8 parties avg	14.8	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2022	313.7 parties avg	13.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Yong Kiat Francis's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Costs for Unreasonable Applications 22 Jun 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	22 Jun 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Striking Out Contempt Application for Lack of Consent 11 May 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	11 May 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Successful in striking out OS 1025Costs of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid by Mr. Ravi and Mr. Cheng (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Roslan bin Bakar v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Death Sentences Based on Mental Disability 08 Mar 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the Attorney-General.
4	Syed Suhail v Attorney-General: Allegations of Racial Discrimination in Drug Trafficking Prosecutions 01 Dec 2021 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	01 Dec 2021	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiffs' originating summons.
5	Daniel Vijay v PP: Joint Murder Charge & Common Intention in Robbery 02 Sep 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	02 Sep 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossAppeal allowed in part for two of the appellants.